Skip to content
Become a member
All posts

The end of "inspections" in classrooms? Why Replace Old Observation Sheets with a Development Tool

  Daniel Markovič  ·  2 minute read

Every teacher knows it. The management enters the classroom, sits at the back desk and pulls out a piece of paper. This is followed by 45 minutes, during which the teacher tries to give the "performance of a lifetime", while the observer fills in the boxes. The result? Often only a formal signature and a number on a scale of 1 to 5.

But what if the goal of observation was not to control, but ro grow? We looked at the difference between the classic Observation Record (based on the applicable guidelines) and the new LCA observation sheet, which is part of the modern NELCA mentoring cycle.

Here's why it's time for a change of optics.

Classic tool: Finding mistakes, errors and administration

The classic Observation Record is primarily a formal and administrative document. Its main purpose is to check whether basic criteria have been met on a high-level, such as the compliance of the content with the pedagogical documents or the expertise of the interpretation.

What does it look like in practice? The observer evaluates the teacher on a scale of 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent). The result is a summative verdict – we learn whether the goal has been met, but not how.

Where is the problem? Imagine that you receive a rating of "3" for the criterion "Activation and involvement of students". This information is vague for the teacher. He doesn't know what exactly he did wrong, or what specific step he should take differently tomorrow to improve. The whole process often leads only to the administrative closure and obtaining the necessary signatures of the teacher and the manager.

New LCA Sheet: A Guide to Change and Development

On the other side stands the LCA observation sheet. This instrument is not about control, but about development and change. It is a process-oriented formative tool.

Instead of one general "Student activity" column, this sheet tracks a range of specific behaviors, such as:

  • The teacher delegates tasks to students whenever possible.
  • Students participate in decision-making.
  • Methods that support active learning and discovery are used.
  • The teacher respects the needs, emotions and opinions of the students.

Why is it better? This tool gives the teacher accurate and actionable feedback. If the observer (or mentor) writes in the note: "I would appreciate more font in the presentation" or indicates that the teacher "does not stimulate curiosity enough", this is a direct instruction to improve. It is evaluated on a scale that tracks the degree of application of the phenomenon (from "does not apply at all" to "applies wonderfully"), which is much more motivating than school grading of a teacher.

Conclusion

While the classic record tells us whether the teacher has fulfilled his duty, the new observation sheet tells us what the quality of learning and the climate in the classroom is.

If we want a real change in education, we must stop just "grading" teachers and start providing them with a mirror that will show them concrete steps forward. The new LCA sheet does exactly that – instead of fear of observation, it brings a culture of collaboration and growth.